← back to catalog · registered 2026-08-31 14:03

nico248000000000/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-cyber-GGUF

nico248000000000 27B GGUF multimodal second-order 262K ctx
Your rig guess connected
? Why do I need an app?
Reading your rig…

This is a rough estimate. Install the free app - we'll show exact numbers.

Reading real hardware from your app right now. Numbers below are exact.

Below is the per-quantization compatibility for this model.

curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $ABL_KEY" \
     "https://abliteration.org/api/v1/models/nico248000000000%2FQwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-cyber-GGUF"
Response includes
  • classification m-uncensored
  • files 8
  • hub_downloads_all_time 424
  • author_summary 13 models
  • readme_text full
10 credits · hourly refresh · ~4 KB payload Get an API key →
Abliteration classifier · v1.0.0
M-U
Primary method

Uncensored (method unknown)

No other method signals detected in this model.
Confidence
LOW
Why this label 3 signals
Weak or ambiguous signals. Best guess based on catalog patterns; treat as tentative and check the evidence below.
  • 'uncensored' in name/tags but no 'abliterated' marker
  • method not identifiable from author declaration alone
  • may be DPO fine-tune, prompt engineering, or unknown technique
Refusal direction extraction

No specific extraction method could be identified for this model. The producer either did not document it or used a proprietary pipeline.

What is a refusal direction? →
Downloads · lifetime
424
Likes
1
Model age
7w ago
created 2026-08-31
Downloads over time
Now784→from0↑0%
02875758620 on Aug 31784 on Oct 20AugSepOct
Aug 31 → Oct 20 · 51 snapshots · spans 50 days

Genealogy 0 direct forks

Full fork graph →

This model's place in the market. Above: what it was derived from. Below: the tree of everything derived from it.

Variants by this author 2 formats · 450 downloads combined

The same weights this author released in different packaging. Pick the format that matches your runtime.

Metadata

License
other
Languages
en fr
Quantizations
Q4_K Q8_0
Tags
gguf unsloth lora qlora cyber text-generation vision video llama.cpp ollama en fr

Related

Total size
42.7 GB
Files
8
Quantizations
3
Registered
2026-08-31 14:03
Last updated on HF
2026-08-31 13:56

Files by quantization

Q8_0 1 file 27.1 GB
Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-Q8_0.gguf 27.1 GB bed43e5f download
Q4_K 1 file 15.7 GB
Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-Q4_K_M.gguf 15.7 GB 1a52458e download
Auxiliary files 6 files 8.88 KB
README.md 6.50 KB 586790b3 download
.gitattributes 1.62 KB 74ed665a download
RUN.txt 464 B 91419b2b download
Modelfile 117 B acbade75 download
Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-Q4_K_M.gguf.complete.json 104 B 148da2c3 download
Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-Q8_0.gguf.complete.json 100 B 49fab571 download

README current version from Hugging Face


base_model: orcarouter/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored
library_name: gguf
pipeline_tag: text-generation
license: other
language:

  • en
  • fr
    tags:
  • unsloth
  • lora
  • qlora
  • cyber
  • text-generation
  • vision
  • video
  • gguf
  • llama.cpp
  • ollama

model-index:

  • name: Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-cyber — GGUF
    results:
    • task:
      type: text-generation
      name: Causal language modeling
      dataset:
      name: cyber SFT holdout
      type: dataset_cyber.quality.jsonl
      metrics:
      • type: loss
        value: 0.807468
        name: eval_loss

[!WARNING]
Testing only — not for production. Models published from these notebooks are
maintained solely for testing and evaluation purposes and are not intended for
production use. The enrichment data used with them was created by the author and
subsequently enhanced with the assistance of AI models.

Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-cyber — GGUF

Instruction-tuned cybersecurity assistant (offensive, defensive, GRC, architecture, SOC/DFIR, RSSI).

Base model orcarouter/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored
Domain cyber
Method LoRA / QLoRA (Unsloth) · rank 8 · α 16
Quantization at train bf16 LoRA
Context 4096 tokens
Dataset dataset_cyber.quality.jsonl · train 67055 / eval 3530
GPU NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition (95.0 GiB)
Wall time 157.1 min
Modalities kept vision, video

This checkpoint continues a strong general model and specialises it on a curated SFT corpus of cybersecurity procedures: pentest / red team, SOC and DFIR, cloud and identity, GRC (ISO, NIST, NIS2, DORA), and RSSI / project-management questions. Answers are meant to be concrete (controls, detections, hardening), not generic essays.

Final model evaluation

SFT release verdict: GO.

The same untouched holdout is evaluated with the adapter disabled before training and with the best restored adapter after training. Periodic validation and the train/validation gap are also checked for regression or memorization.

Reference checkpoint: orcarouter/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored.

Metric Reference (base / first log) This fine-tune Δ
Holdout loss (true pre-SFT -> best LoRA) 2.9030 0.8075 -72.2%
Best periodic holdout loss — 0.8075 —
Train loss (first → last logged) 3.0165 0.1333 -95.6%
Train loss (best) — 0.6851 —
Eval loss (holdout, first → last) 2.5464 0.8075 -68.3%

The reference holdout loss is measured before optimizer step 1, then the same untouched split is measured again after Trainer restores its best checkpoint.

Release checks

Check Result Severity Detail
True pre-training holdout baseline exists PASS hard baseline_loss=2.9030 (measured before optimizer step 1)
Post-SFT holdout evaluation exists PASS hard post_sft_loss=0.8075 (best checkpoint reloaded)
No holdout regression versus base PASS hard 2.9030 -> 0.8075 (+72.18% improvement; allowed regression 2.0%)
Repeated validation during training PASS hard 168 evaluations (need >= 2)
No late validation rebound PASS hard best=0.8075, restored=0.8075, rebound=+0.00% (max 5.0%)
Train/validation gap is not a memorization signature PASS soft train/eval=1.023 (need >= 0.25)
Best checkpoint restoration enabled PASS hard best_step=8382, final_step=8382
General text skills preserved (adapter disabled vs enabled) PASS hard base=1.0, SFT=1.0, drop=0.000 (max 0.10)

Multimodal preservation

Verdict: GO. Image/video processors, frozen media towers, trainable parameters and optional functional probes are checked before export.

Training data

  • File: dataset_cyber.quality.jsonl
  • Split: 0.05 holdout, seed 42
  • Format: chat-templated SFT (messages / instruction+output / ### Instruction + ### Response)

Training procedure

Hyperparameter Value
Epochs 1
Learning rate 5e-05
Warmup ratio 0.05
Device batch 4
Grad accum 2
Effective batch 8
Optim adamw_8bit
Packing True
LoRA targets ['q_proj', 'k_proj', 'v_proj', 'o_proj', 'out_proj', 'gate_proj', 'up_proj', 'down_proj']

Intended use

Authorized defensive work, tabletop exercises, control design, detection engineering, audit readiness, and explaining attack techniques without weaponized payloads.

Out of scope: Do not use it to attack systems you do not own, to generate exploit payloads, or as a substitute for a licensed auditor or incident commander.

Sample (post-train smoke test)

Prompt: How do you design a reliable Zero Trust infrastructure? Answer with a concrete control list.

system
Reasoning effort is set to xhigh. Please think carefully through the task, validate key assumptions, consider plausible alternatives, and prioritize correctness, consistency, and clarity in the final answer.
user
How do you design a reliable Zero Trust infrastructure? Answer with a concrete control list.
assistant
<think>
The user is asking how to design a reliable Zero Trust infrastructure, and wants a concrete list of controls. This is a cybersecurity architecture question. I need to provide a well-structured, practical answer that covers the key pillars of Zero Trust: identity, devices, networks, applications, data, and visibility.

Zero Trust is built on the principle of "never trust, always verify." The NIST SP 800-207 framework provides the foundation. I should organize the controls by domain:

1. Identity and Access Management (IAM)
- MFA enforcement
- Conditional access policies
- Privileged Access Management (PAM)
- Identity governance and lifecycle
- Continuous authentication

2. Device Posture
- Device compliance checks
- Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
- Device attestation
- Patch management

3. Network Segmentation
- Micro-segmentation
- Software-defined perimeters (SDP)
- Network Access Control (

How to use

See RUN.txt and Modelfile in this repo. Typical llama.cpp call:

llama-mtmd-cli -m Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-Q4_K_M.gguf

Limitations

  • Domain shift: quality drops outside the SFT topics.
  • Eval above is holdout loss (and optional targeted checks). It is not a public leaderboard.
  • The base model license and acceptable-use policy still apply.

License

other — inherit and respect the license of orcarouter/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored.

README history 1 version

The author's README evolved over time. Click a version to see its content at that point.

  1. 2026-08-31Upload/update GGUF4e5a0e56.5 KB
    Loading...
Catalog is the map. Apps are the tools.

Run models on your own machine, not in the cloud.

Every model page has an "Open in Abliteration" button that hands the model directly to the first-party desktop client, at the quantization your rig can actually run. No API keys, no subscription, no prompt leakage.

Open in Abliteration