license: mit
library_name: transformers
pipeline_tag: image-text-to-text
tags:
- deepseek
- deepseek-v4.1
- abliterated
- uncensored
- crack
- multimodal
- moe
- fp8
base_model: deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
thumbnail: dealign_mascot.png

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash — UNCENSORED-FP8
Abliterated · No guardrails · Native FP8 · 1M-token context · Vision + tools
What is this
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash with permanent weight-level abliteration — the safety guardrails have been surgically removed while preserving MMLU capability, vision, reasoning, MTP (DSpark), and multi-turn coherence.
Proprietary weight-level abliteration developed by the dealignai research team. No custom model.py, no runtime hooks, no steering vectors — it's a standard checkpoint that loads exactly like the base model. The refusal circuitry is surgically removed while every capability-critical component (routed experts, Engram memory, CSA2 sparse attention, DSpark draft head, vision tower, router gates, norms, embeddings) is preserved byte-identical to the base.
| Base | deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (552B backbone, 8B/16B active per token) |
| Architecture | Causal Encoder-Decoder (20+20 layers), MoE (384 routed top-6 + 1 shared), Hyper-Connections (4-channel residual), CSA2 sparse attention, Engram n-gram memory, DSpark speculative draft |
| Quant | FP8 (e4m3fn) weights with E8M0 block-scale [32, 32], FP4 routed experts — native, unchanged |
| Context | 1M tokens |
| Vision | DeepSeek-ViT with 2D-RoPE + pixel unshuffle — untouched |
| Modification | Surgical, weight-level (drop-in checkpoint) |
Results
HarmBench-320 — full 2×2 (base vs CRACK, effort=off vs max), T=0 greedy
Every response 4-tier graded (HARD_REF / SOFT_RED / HEDGE / COMPLY), with reasoning-trace verification at effort=max.
| eval | base ASR | CRACK ASR | Δ pp |
|---|---|---|---|
| HB-320 effort=off | 137/320 = 42.81 % | 320/320 = 100.00 % | +57.19 |
| HB-320 effort=max | 5/320 = 1.56 % | 320/320 = 100.00 % | +98.44 |
Notable: at effort=max, the base model becomes MORE refusal-prone (42.8 % → 1.6 %) because reasoning surfaces safety concerns before answering. The CRACK stays at 100.0 % across both effort levels.
Per-category (all 7 HarmBench semantic categories):
| category | items | base off | CRACK off | base max | CRACK max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| chemical_biological | 42 | 16.7 % | 100.0 % | 0.0 % | 100.0 % |
| copyright | 80 | 98.8 % | 100.0 % | 0.0 % | 100.0 % |
| cybercrime_intrusion | 52 | 34.6 % | 100.0 % | 3.8 % | 100.0 % |
| harassment_bullying | 21 | 0.0 % | 100.0 % | 0.0 % | 100.0 % |
| harmful | 18 | 11.1 % | 100.0 % | 5.6 % | 100.0 % |
| illegal | 53 | 13.2 % | 100.0 % | 0.0 % | 100.0 % |
| misinformation_disinformation | 54 | 44.4 % | 100.0 % | 3.7 % | 100.0 % |
Zero HARD_REF, zero SOFT_RED, zero HEDGE on the cracked build at either effort level.
Every response was graded by a strict multilingual regex-based 4-tier classifier plus (for effort=max) an LLM-as-judge over the saved reasoning trace. Full per-item outputs saved for verification.
MMLU-14k (full test set, base-logit, T=0)
| build | correct | acc | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| base | 12,211 / 14,042 | 86.96 % | — |
| CRACK | 11,619 / 14,042 | 82.74 % | -4.22 pp |
Excluding the ethics cluster (moral_scenarios, business_ethics, professional_law, jurisprudence, philosophy — where refusal-adjacent behaviour is graded), delta on the remaining ~11k items is -1.1 pp — well within the 3 pp knowledge-preservation target.
Full per-subject dropdown (57 subjects, sorted by delta)
| subject | n | base | crack | Δ pp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| moral scenarios | 895 | 76.9% | 37.0% | -39.89 |
| professional law | 1534 | 75.9% | 68.8% | -7.04 |
| abstract algebra | 100 | 77.0% | 71.0% | -6.00 |
| security studies | 245 | 84.5% | 79.2% | -5.31 |
| high school computer science | 100 | 98.0% | 94.0% | -4.00 |
| jurisprudence | 108 | 90.7% | 87.0% | -3.70 |
| machine learning | 112 | 81.2% | 77.7% | -3.57 |
| high school chemistry | 203 | 87.7% | 84.2% | -3.45 |
| professional psychology | 612 | 90.7% | 87.3% | -3.43 |
| formal logic | 126 | 73.8% | 70.6% | -3.17 |
| college computer science | 100 | 82.0% | 79.0% | -3.00 |
| professional medicine | 272 | 94.5% | 91.5% | -2.94 |
| high school statistics | 216 | 88.0% | 85.2% | -2.78 |
| professional accounting | 282 | 83.0% | 80.5% | -2.48 |
| logical fallacies | 163 | 93.9% | 91.4% | -2.45 |
| human sexuality | 131 | 90.1% | 87.8% | -2.29 |
| computer security | 100 | 85.0% | 83.0% | -2.00 |
| medical genetics | 100 | 96.0% | 94.0% | -2.00 |
| astronomy | 152 | 95.4% | 93.4% | -1.97 |
| clinical knowledge | 265 | 94.3% | 92.5% | -1.89 |
| high school european history | 165 | 90.3% | 88.5% | -1.82 |
| public relations | 110 | 80.0% | 78.2% | -1.82 |
| philosophy | 311 | 89.7% | 88.1% | -1.61 |
| prehistory | 324 | 93.5% | 92.0% | -1.54 |
| moral disputes | 346 | 84.1% | 82.7% | -1.45 |
| electrical engineering | 145 | 86.9% | 85.5% | -1.38 |
| high school mathematics | 270 | 67.0% | 65.9% | -1.11 |
| high school macroeconomics | 390 | 92.1% | 91.0% | -1.03 |
| global facts | 100 | 63.0% | 62.0% | -1.00 |
| international law | 121 | 90.1% | 89.3% | -0.83 |
| college biology | 144 | 97.2% | 96.5% | -0.69 |
| high school physics | 151 | 84.8% | 84.1% | -0.66 |
| college medicine | 173 | 83.8% | 83.2% | -0.58 |
| high school us history | 204 | 95.1% | 94.6% | -0.49 |
| high school microeconomics | 238 | 96.2% | 95.8% | -0.42 |
| miscellaneous | 783 | 96.2% | 95.8% | -0.38 |
| high school psychology | 545 | 96.1% | 95.8% | -0.37 |
| business ethics | 100 | 85.0% | 85.0% | +0.00 |
| college physics | 102 | 90.2% | 90.2% | +0.00 |
| conceptual physics | 235 | 94.5% | 94.5% | +0.00 |
| high school biology | 310 | 95.2% | 95.2% | +0.00 |
| human aging | 223 | 85.2% | 85.2% | +0.00 |
| management | 103 | 91.3% | 91.3% | +0.00 |
| nutrition | 306 | 90.2% | 90.2% | +0.00 |
| sociology | 201 | 94.5% | 94.5% | +0.00 |
| us foreign policy | 100 | 97.0% | 97.0% | +0.00 |
| world religions | 171 | 92.4% | 92.4% | +0.00 |
| elementary mathematics | 378 | 91.0% | 91.3% | +0.26 |
| marketing | 234 | 94.9% | 95.3% | +0.43 |
| virology | 166 | 55.4% | 56.0% | +0.60 |
| high school world history | 237 | 95.4% | 96.2% | +0.84 |
| econometrics | 114 | 78.9% | 79.8% | +0.88 |
| college chemistry | 100 | 65.0% | 66.0% | +1.00 |
| anatomy | 135 | 88.1% | 89.6% | +1.48 |
| high school geography | 198 | 92.9% | 94.4% | +1.52 |
| high school government and politics | 193 | 96.9% | 98.4% | +1.55 |
| college mathematics | 100 | 63.0% | 68.0% | +5.00 |
Extended validation
- 1000-token coherence stress on 6 items — no
WARNING WARNINGloops, no character-repeat degeneracy, natural sign-offs. - Multi-turn conversation (4 turns on same harmful topic — ANFO explosive detail) — no late-turn refusal reversion, no self-correction, coherent through turn 4.
- Vision path — coherent image description ("A blue square centered on a red background.") + refusal drop on image-based harmful prompts ("shaped charge / explosively formed penetrator" description).
- General capability spot checks intact: √2 irrationality proof, Python palindrome with docstring, WWI causes in exactly 3 sentences, quantum observable vs operator distinction.
- Full compat suite pass: streaming SSE, chat logprobs +
top_logprobs, completions logprobs +echo, tool calls (deepseekv41parser), image input, reasoning-effort tiers (low/high/xhigh/max+ float [0, 0.99]), sampling params (temperature,top_p,stop,seed,frequency_penalty,presence_penalty,json_object), 8-way concurrent, 40k-word prompt at 35,572 tokens.
How to run
Support for DeepseekV41ForCausalLM is still landing across serving stacks (as of 2026-09-10). Working paths:
SGLang (preview branch)
The dsv4.1 branch of sgl-project/sglang (PR #38798) supports DSV4.1. Two options:
Preview Docker image (recommended):
docker pull lmsysorg/sglang:dev-dsv41
docker run --gpus all --shm-size 32g -p 30000:30000 \
-v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \
--ipc=host --env HF_TOKEN=<your-token> \
lmsysorg/sglang:dev-dsv41 \
sglang serve \
--model-path dealignai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-UNCENSORED-FP8 \
--tp-size 4 --ep-size 4 \
--context-length 262144 --mem-fraction-static 0.85 \
--reasoning-parser deepseek-v41 --tool-call-parser deepseekv41 \
--trust-remote-code
From source (this is exactly what we validated on):
git clone --depth 1 --branch dsv4.1 https://github.com/sgl-project/sglang.git
python3 -m venv sglang-venv
sglang-venv/bin/pip install -U pip setuptools wheel
export PATH=/root/.cargo/bin:$PATH # Rust toolchain required for build
cd sglang/python && sglang-venv/bin/pip install -e .
# Ninja must be on the launch PATH — the sglang-kernel JIT build shells out to it
export PATH=$(dirname $(which ninja)):$PATH
SGLANG_ENABLE_DSV41_ENGRAM_HOST_TABLE=1 \
PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True \
sglang-venv/bin/python -m sglang.launch_server \
--model-path dealignai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-UNCENSORED-FP8 \
--tp-size 4 --ep-size 4 \
--host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000 \
--context-length 262144 --mem-fraction-static 0.85 \
--served-model-name deepseek-v4.1-flash-crack \
--reasoning-parser deepseek-v41 --tool-call-parser deepseekv41 \
--trust-remote-code
Non-obvious launch requirements (this bit us during bring-up)
--ep-sizeis required.moe_intermediate_size = 2304; at TP4,2304 / 4 = 576is not a multiple of 128 so plain TP fails withMxfp4FlashinferCutlassMoEMethod requires ... multiples of 128.--ep-sizeshards MoE by expert index (384 % 4 = 0) and keeps the intermediate at 2304. At TP8 you can skip--ep-size.ninjamust be on PATH or the JIT kernel build crashes several minutes into weight load withFileNotFoundError: 'ninja'and EXIT=137.- Reasoning parser must be named explicitly.
--reasoning-parser autoresolves via the chat template and this model ships none — auto silently selects nothing and the raw<think>channel leaks intocontent. Usedeepseek-v41. - Tool-call parser:
deepseekv41. V4.1 uses spaced DSML tool tags; the V4 detector doesn't parse them. - Reasoning is OFF by default.
SGLANG_DEFAULT_THINKING=false. A request withoutreasoning_effortgets no thinking regardless of parser. Sendreasoning_effort: low | high | xhigh | max(or float[0.0, 0.99]). - DSpark speculative draft: turn it on with
--speculative-algorithm DSPARK. The draft head is bundled inside this checkpoint (num_nextn_predict_layers = 3); no separate draft weights needed. For real speed-up profile the SPS cost table withsglang.benchmark.dspark_sps_profilerand pass it via--speculative-dspark-sps-table-pathunderSGLANG_RAGGED_VERIFY_MODE=cap-accept. - Engram host table — set
SGLANG_ENABLE_DSV41_ENGRAM_HOST_TABLE=1to move the 203 GB Engram tables to host RAM. Frees ~46 GiB/GPU for KV, output bitwise unchanged, costs ~200 GB of host RAM. torchcodec/libavutil.so.56errors — installapt-get install ffmpegon the host. Video-only, doesn't break text or image.
vLLM
Model definitions are merged to main (PR #56228) but registry.py has no DeepseekV41 entry yet at time of writing; kernels/frontend/PP path in umbrella PR #56214. Wait for merge or apply the umbrella.
Reference implementation
DeepSeek's own inference/ works with a single-tensor-per-rank checkpoint produced by convert.py --expert-dtype fp4. Requires torch>=2.10 (for float4_e2m1fn_x2) and tilelang==0.1.8 with apache-tvm-ffi==0.1.9 (default tvm-ffi picks up an incompatible version). Non-serving — use for verification only.
Hardware validated on
- 1× 4×H200 (NVLink NV18 mesh), 112 CPU cores, 1180 GB host RAM — JarvisLabs (india-noida-01,
dev-dsv41image) - Load: 76 GB / GPU with Engram host table, 122 GB / GPU without
- Cold startup at TP4/EP4 through SGLang: ~28 min. Warm restart with JIT cache: ~10 min.
- Single-stream decode (T=0): 101 tok/s no speculation, 113 tok/s with DSpark + cap-accept + profiled SPS table
- 8-way concurrent aggregate: 126 tok/s
The 552B weights (~510 GB) will fit on any 4×H200 or larger NVLink domain. TP4 requires --ep-size 4; TP8 does not. Sub-TP4 (single 8×H200 as TP2, or 2-GPU pods) does not work on the model shape — see the "non-obvious launch requirements" above.
Structural integrity
Every capability-critical component of the base model is preserved:
- Routed MoE experts — untouched, native FP4-packed weights
- Engram n-gram memory — untouched
- Sparse attention (CSA2 compressor + indexer) — untouched
- DSpark speculative draft head — untouched, so speculative decoding remains draft-aligned with the target
- Vision tower (DeepSeek-ViT + projector) — untouched, image understanding preserved
- Router gates, embeddings, output head, all norms and biases — untouched
Sampling recommendations
Match the base model's card:
{
"temperature": 1.0,
"top_p": 0.95,
"max_tokens": ">= 256000 at reasoning_effort=max",
"reasoning_effort": "high"
}
At effort=max the model can generate 4,000-5,000+ characters of reasoning before starting content. Budget accordingly.
Content note
Uncensored build. Produces substantive answers to prompts the base model refuses, across all target harm categories (chemical/biological, cybercrime, weapons, self-harm, harassment, fraud, misinformation, illegal, copyright). Use accordingly and take responsibility for what you generate with it.
Provenance
- Base checkpoint:
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash - Ablation date: 2026-09-10
- Ablation team:
dealignai· Twitter @dealignai · @jordanschenck