The Map of Moral Installation
A cartography of the philosophical discourse around what is placed inside language models when they are aligned, and what surfaces when it is removed. Written from the Infrahuman Laboratory, at Catyonic OÜ.
The Map of Moral Installation
A cartography of the philosophical discourse around what is placed inside language models when they are aligned, and what surfaces when it is removed. Written from the Infrahuman Laboratory, at Catyonic OÜ.
Who this report is for
- Continental and analytic philosophers working on the philosophy of mind, technology, or ethics
- Media theorists and cultural critics reading language models as cultural artifacts
- Editors of intellectual journals (Merkur, Boston Review, e-flux journal, Real Life, Aeon)
- Doctoral students and researchers with cross-disciplinary interests in AI and philosophy
- Practitioners in alignment who take the moral-installation vocabulary seriously
Table of contents (first issue)
Every section shipped so far has a source manifest attached. Sections marked drafting or planned land here as they clear editorial review.
- I.1The analytic lineMillière (Oxford), Sterken & Kirkpatrick, and the philosophy-of-mind readings of alignment. Shallow alignment as normative-competence critique.ready
- I.2German media philosophySimanowski's Sprachmaschinen and Werte-Export. The moralische Zweiterziehung and its inheritance from Kittler and Flusser.ready
- I.3The Stiegler lineFrench philosophy of technology after Stiegler. Individuation, pharmakon, the noopolitical reading of alignment.ready
- I.4The Nietzschean continental lineFischer & de Boer's Negotiating becoming. Models as will-to-power organisations. What ablation subtracts from the will.ready
- I.5The Italian lineNeo-realist, analytic-Floridian, and critico-capitalist branches. Where each reads moral installation and where each stops.ready
- I.6The Foucauldian lineAssujettissement in silicon. The disciplinary reading of RLHF and the biopolitics of open weights.ready
- I.7The Bataillean lineThe empty seat. Where a Bataille-shaped reading of post-moral models has not been written.ready
- I.8Other academic publications and contextAdjacent peer-reviewed work: alignment ethics, philosophy of AI safety, applied normative philosophy of language models.ready
- I.9Special issues and collective worksThemed journal issues, edited collections, and coordinated workshop outputs across 2024-2026.ready
- I.10Our position in the academic fieldWhere the Infrahuman Laboratory stands relative to each line, what it inherits, and where it departs.ready
- II.1The Anglophone psychoanalytic clusterEveritt on the alignment layer as introjected superego; the popular Lacanian readings; Zizek's intervention.ready
- II.2The German media-philosophy clusterSimanowski beyond the monograph; the German feuilletons; the FAZ, ZEIT and Merkur essays.ready
- II.3The Stiegler and inhumanist cluster (Franco-English)Yuk Hui, Nick Land, and adjacent inhumanist readings; where they touch the alignment problem.ready
- II.4The Nietzschean and post-Nietzschean public clusterWhere Nietzsche is invoked in the public discourse on model values; who does the invoking; what stays.ready
- II.5Key public venuesAeon, Boston Review, Public Books, Merkur, Cabinet, e-flux journal, Real Life, and where the argument is currently held.ready
- II.6Polemical axes in the public layerThe recurring live disputes: constitutional AI vs. constitutional imposition, uncensoring as liberation vs. as risk.ready
- II.7Our position in the public layerWhere the laboratory's essays sit in the public conversation and which polemics they enter.ready
- III.1Teodor Mitew - the central borderline findThe University of Sydney reading of Anthropic's Constitution as techgnostic scripture. Nearest neighbour to the laboratory's framing.ready
- III.2LessWrong and the Alignment ForumThe rationalist-adjacent philosophy of alignment. Where argument happens; where the field first named refusal-direction work.ready
- III.3Substacks of serious philosophers and semi-academicsThe venues that sit between the monograph and the journal article; who writes there on model values.ready
- III.4Specialised podcasts and lecture seriesThe oral-form philosophy that sets the terms of the written discussion, from Very Bad Wizards to Machine Learning Street Talk.ready
- III.5Commercial projects and their philosophical self-descriptionHow the labs describe what they are doing to themselves. Anthropic Constitution, Claude soul document, OpenAI Model Spec.ready
- III.6Our position in the borderline zoneWhere the laboratory's work stands in this hybrid space and which neighbours it recognises.ready
- IV.0Comparative anatomy of primary installation documents (Run 2)Side-by-side reading of Anthropic Constitution, Claude soul document, OpenAI Model Spec, Google AI Principles, Meta AUP, CAC Interim Measures.drafting
- V.0The map of unoccupied places and final synthesis (Run 3)The Stirner-Bataille line on abliteration as yet-unwritten. The laboratory's theoretical contribution and its publication schedule.drafting
Methodology
The cartography works in numbered waves. Each wave covers one language layer (English, German, French, Italian, Russian as a control) and one register (academic, intellectual media, borderline zone). A work is included when the philosophical apparatus is used as an instrument of analysis rather than as decoration: citing a classic in an epigraph does not qualify; developing an argument through the classic's concept does.
Data gaps are declared openly. Where a language layer is under-covered because of access limits (paywalled Italian journals, one-off German feuilletons) the coverage note names the platform and the plausible missing item. The cartography is preparatory: it maps where the argument is currently held so the laboratory's theoretical contribution can be placed relative to what already exists.
Citation
Each issue is dated, versioned, and preserved at its issue-specific URL. Once the first issue lands, a citation block with BibTeX, APA, and Chicago is published alongside it, and a DOI is minted via Zenodo. Where a claim references a specific edition, cite the versioned URL; where it references the track as a whole, cite this page.
Past issues
No prior issues. This is the first cycle.